<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Central Maryland Photographers&#039; Guild - Topic: Let the games begin!</title>
	<link>http://www.cmpg.org/site/forum/camera-camera/let-the-games-begin/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 4.3.3</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cmpg.org/site/forum/?camera-camera&#038;let-the-games-begin&#038;xfeed=topic" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>slothead on Let the games begin!</title>
	<link>http://www.cmpg.org/site/forum/camera-camera/let-the-games-begin/#p305</link>
	<category>Camera, Camera</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cmpg.org/site/forum/camera-camera/let-the-games-begin/#p305</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was interesting data too Geren.&#160; I compared my 3 Nikons, and my PPS (Practically Point and Shoot) D5000 was better in most characteristics than my D300 and D300S!&#160; Obviously there are some other attributes that the 300s do better than the 5000, but still it was eye-opening.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Geren Mortensen on Let the games begin!</title>
	<link>http://www.cmpg.org/site/forum/camera-camera/let-the-games-begin/#p59</link>
	<category>Camera, Camera</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cmpg.org/site/forum/camera-camera/let-the-games-begin/#p59</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, lessee ... Based on the random cameras on the front page of the site, the three year old Canon 5D is only a small percentage behind the Nikon D3, as far as RAW IQ is concerned. Since the D700 uses basically the same sensor and processing as the D3, and based on what I&#39;ve seen from the pre-production samples, the RAW IQ of the Canon 5DMkII is going to blow the D3 and D700 right out of the water.</p>
<p>I also ran a few checks on their system, and have found at least one issue -- I&#39;m left wondering how a camera that processes RAW data at 12-bits can have better color depth than one that processes RAW data a 14-bits. The math doesn&#39;t hold true. Of course, DxO are the folks who worked behind the scenes on Nikon&#39;s RAW processing software, so I could guess they might be a little biased -- more Nikon units sold=more DxO software sold? Hmmm...</p>
<p>That said ... I think that the images from the original 5D, the D3, the D700 and even the Canon 1DsMkII have a better <em>subjective</em> image quality than the Canon 5DMkII and the 1DsMkIII. I think we&#39;ve reached a point where things might be <em>too</em>&#160;good.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Earl Blake on Let the games begin!</title>
	<link>http://www.cmpg.org/site/forum/camera-camera/let-the-games-begin/#p58</link>
	<category>Camera, Camera</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cmpg.org/site/forum/camera-camera/let-the-games-begin/#p58</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>DxO Labs has created a website that mesures and ranks only the camera&#39;s raw image quality.&#160; This should put an end to all the "My camera is better than your camera." This will show that Nikon is far supperior to Canon! :-)</p>
<p></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dxomark.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dxomark.com/</a></p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>